THE FORUMS
It sounds like needs to get laid.
it sounds like he is right
__________________
My 100 day challenge report: http://www.rsdnation.com/node/198632. Updated October 28.
so what about the ideal of strong reality then?
Dude this stuff is REALLY obvious. I am sure he is a genius, but this observation is far from ingenious. Actually, science is rooted in the fact that all theories are tentative and available to be challenged (both social and physical science).
He did word it quite well though.
He did word it quite well though.
__________________
[/font]
[/font]
so what about the ideal of strong reality then?
LOL
LOL
__________________
burn baby burn
Your evidence being....?
I am sure he is a genius, but...
-
__________________
My 100 day challenge report: http://www.rsdnation.com/node/198632. Updated October 28.
'Those who can't do, teach, those who can't teach, teach gym.'
__________________
All he is saying is that you can have strong beliefs until science proves your beliefs wrong. At that point you will probably adopt a new set of beliefs, based on your new understanding of the world. Not that difficult.
__________________
My 100 day challenge report: http://www.rsdnation.com/node/198632. Updated October 28.
It doesn't literally mean I know he's a genius, it's just a figure of speech. And generally Harvard professors who went to Princeton and got a PhD at MIT are genius. Not the most ridiculous thought out there
Your evidence being....?
I am sure he is a genius, but...
__________________
[/font]
[/font]
Haakjöringsköd
Junior Member
Join Date: 01/07/2011 | Posts: 26
In my view, it is best to consider all knowledge as tentative. The best scholars maintain an open-mindedness and humility about even their own core beliefs. Excessive conviction is often a sign of insufficient thought, which in turn may be derived from a certain pig-headedness. Intellectual maturity comes when you can maintain the right balance between informed belief and honest skepticism.
what do you think?