We Love Brad
Alright, so this post is partially to reignite my participation in the RSDN forums, and the topic is something I’ve recently gone through, and I just like the topic as well.
I was perusing RSDN, and came across a thread with my name in it, asking about how to stop external validation, and caring about what other people think of you.
First Check Out the Vid, and then I’ll explain a few things in further detail below:
Youtube link
Thread on RSDN
Thread on Brad Branson.com

It all comes down to self esteem in the end, the only way to feel worthy, comes down to how much value you put on yourself.
I’m not going to go into an extreme post here breaking down the ways to garner higher self esteem, suffice it to say, the more shit you do, and do well, the more confident you feel to do ANYTHING, including attracting a hot girl into your life.
Then there is the confidence that comes from actually getting experience with hot girls, having them respond well, and you affirming that you ARE getting better at pick up.
But there lies the dilemma, how to not SEEK good reactions if you are trying to get better at something.
It’s not the reactions or the results that should make you feel good, make up your identity, it’s the process of growing, the process of pushing through your fears, and learning through experience.
THAT is actually what makes you trust yourself more. Guys just look at the external result, and take on that. But the problem is, if you identify with the good reactions, you also fear the negative, because you have to take on those as well.

As I mentioned in the video, there is an entire side step around this, it’s Forcing the Fun as I like to call it.
Basically, over time you begin to realize that whoever has the strongest frame of reality wins, and you can almost FORCE people to respond in a certain way. But it is not through poking, prodding them to do something, it comes from believing in what you want SO MUCH, that your frame ends up stronger than theirs.
So if you believe, like fully in the deepest depth of your heart, that whatever happens TONIGHT, it’s going to be fun NO MATTER WHAT, it doesn’t matter what someone does, or says.
It’s unwavering.
This gets you turned inward again, and expressing outward, unreliant on the environment, it’s purely self expression, self love, and self amusement.
The problem is, as mentioned in the video, most people need their environment to give them permission to act in a specific way, because…
That is how people normally act!
You calibrate to your environment, and act how everyone else around you is acting.
But, unless a very specific situation arises, more often than not, the natural reaction to a social environment is to be reserved and not TOO social, maybe just talk to a few people if serendipity prevails.
Instead, buck the trend, hit shit hard, and take what you want!
This is why it’s challenging to get started at the beginning of the night, because IT’S NOT NORMAL to talk to lots of people you don’t know.
But what the goal is, by surrounding yourself with other people who go out and cold approach, and reading RSDNation to surround yourself with MORE people (virtually at least) doing this, you start getting to that tipping point where you no longer think it’s weird to go up to random strangers.
It becomes weirder NOT to approach, as opposed to just standing around doing nothing.
But especially if you don’t have good wings, or your friends/colleagues/family are coming from anti social chode mindsets, things are tough.
You are fighting YEARS of conditioning pushing you back to your old self, and all you have is me and a few other digital friends pushing you in the other direction.
But lemme tell you.
It’s oh so sweet on the other side.
I guess you’ll have to take my word. ;)
Just as some guys responded in the thread, start off by pushing your comfort zone to be unstifled.
See how much fun you can have to the point of social awkwardness. And then, as people start to take notice...
Hold it!
Hold it!!
Hold the frame!!!
Make them seem weird for not joining in.
If you believe it strong enough, (which you probably won't at first) people either won't even notice, or join in the fun.
Haha, I'd like to hear about some people trying this...
If anyone has an example, comment about it below.
Also, I'm going to be spending more time on the forums, so hit up the main forum and throw some questions by me.
Lastly, I've got a few NYC bootcamps scheduled over the next few months. Summer time in THE CITY, gonna be so sick! I usually have a few old instructors popping in to say hi, as well as a lot of really stellar assistants.
So hit me up, and let's mack some girls together!
I was perusing RSDN, and came across a thread with my name in it, asking about how to stop external validation, and caring about what other people think of you.
First Check Out the Vid, and then I’ll explain a few things in further detail below:
Youtube link
Thread on RSDN
Thread on Brad Branson.com

It all comes down to self esteem in the end, the only way to feel worthy, comes down to how much value you put on yourself.
I’m not going to go into an extreme post here breaking down the ways to garner higher self esteem, suffice it to say, the more shit you do, and do well, the more confident you feel to do ANYTHING, including attracting a hot girl into your life.
Then there is the confidence that comes from actually getting experience with hot girls, having them respond well, and you affirming that you ARE getting better at pick up.
But there lies the dilemma, how to not SEEK good reactions if you are trying to get better at something.
It’s not the reactions or the results that should make you feel good, make up your identity, it’s the process of growing, the process of pushing through your fears, and learning through experience.
THAT is actually what makes you trust yourself more. Guys just look at the external result, and take on that. But the problem is, if you identify with the good reactions, you also fear the negative, because you have to take on those as well.

As I mentioned in the video, there is an entire side step around this, it’s Forcing the Fun as I like to call it.
Basically, over time you begin to realize that whoever has the strongest frame of reality wins, and you can almost FORCE people to respond in a certain way. But it is not through poking, prodding them to do something, it comes from believing in what you want SO MUCH, that your frame ends up stronger than theirs.
So if you believe, like fully in the deepest depth of your heart, that whatever happens TONIGHT, it’s going to be fun NO MATTER WHAT, it doesn’t matter what someone does, or says.
It’s unwavering.
This gets you turned inward again, and expressing outward, unreliant on the environment, it’s purely self expression, self love, and self amusement.
The problem is, as mentioned in the video, most people need their environment to give them permission to act in a specific way, because…
That is how people normally act!
You calibrate to your environment, and act how everyone else around you is acting.
But, unless a very specific situation arises, more often than not, the natural reaction to a social environment is to be reserved and not TOO social, maybe just talk to a few people if serendipity prevails.
Instead, buck the trend, hit shit hard, and take what you want!
This is why it’s challenging to get started at the beginning of the night, because IT’S NOT NORMAL to talk to lots of people you don’t know.
But what the goal is, by surrounding yourself with other people who go out and cold approach, and reading RSDNation to surround yourself with MORE people (virtually at least) doing this, you start getting to that tipping point where you no longer think it’s weird to go up to random strangers.
It becomes weirder NOT to approach, as opposed to just standing around doing nothing.
But especially if you don’t have good wings, or your friends/colleagues/family are coming from anti social chode mindsets, things are tough.
You are fighting YEARS of conditioning pushing you back to your old self, and all you have is me and a few other digital friends pushing you in the other direction.
But lemme tell you.
It’s oh so sweet on the other side.
I guess you’ll have to take my word. ;)
Just as some guys responded in the thread, start off by pushing your comfort zone to be unstifled.
See how much fun you can have to the point of social awkwardness. And then, as people start to take notice...
Hold it!
Hold it!!
Hold the frame!!!
Make them seem weird for not joining in.
If you believe it strong enough, (which you probably won't at first) people either won't even notice, or join in the fun.
Haha, I'd like to hear about some people trying this...
If anyone has an example, comment about it below.
Also, I'm going to be spending more time on the forums, so hit up the main forum and throw some questions by me.
Lastly, I've got a few NYC bootcamps scheduled over the next few months. Summer time in THE CITY, gonna be so sick! I usually have a few old instructors popping in to say hi, as well as a lot of really stellar assistants.
So hit me up, and let's mack some girls together!




Comments
Thoma5
Member
Join Date: 05/17/2012 | Posts: 63
dave7-
Trusted Member
Join Date: 05/14/2012 | Posts: 1986
Now I'll read the artcle.
thecrochunter
Respected Member
Join Date: 09/12/2011 | Posts: 324
Rubennnnn
Member
Join Date: 12/30/2011 | Posts: 91
Lateralus
Respected Member
Join Date: 12/05/2009 | Posts: 622
Goo
Junior Member
Join Date: 03/13/2012 | Posts: 23
Jordanfan
Senior Member
Join Date: 03/31/2010 | Posts: 176
you said the following
"But there lies the dilemma, how to not SEEK good reactions if you are trying to get better at something."
I don't understand why you wouldn't seek good interactions and likewise don't understand the problem with seeking good reactions. I mean first off if we didn't care how our interactions went we wouldn't be reading this. We are all here because we want specific interactions to go well. Regardless of what one tells their mind their subconscious is always going to want good interactions. Let's say we do tell our mind that we don't care about the outcome of the interaction. The only reason we are telling our mind we don't care about the interaction is because we think that if we don't care about the reaction then it will go better. IMO it doesn't hurt for someone to seek a good reaction. I think you could argue that it helps.
I think the whole "don't seek good interactions" is misleading. One because it's not possible, and secondly it doesn't really address the problem. The problem is when people identify themseleves as their failures and when they care too much about a single interaction. I think it would be better to just tell people that they shouldn't get upset when they are learning things and they fail. It's part of the process and failure is where one finds a solution.
If they want good reactions then they must seek them. If you don't seek something then you don't want it.
I feel like if you look at any master you will find that they seek what they want. Tiger Wood's clearly seeks to hit a good shot everytime. Does he always hit a good shot, no. If he didn't seek to hit a good shot, aka didn't seek positive reactions then he would not get better.
Jordanfan
Senior Member
Join Date: 03/31/2010 | Posts: 176
What is wrong with external validation?
People labeled as extroverts are generally more externally validated than introverts yet on average they are much more successful with girls.
You said don't calibrate?
I can name at least ten people who don't calibrate and appear to have fun doing whatever they are doing. These people are the weirdest and most socially awkward people I know.
Going to a club and not being social is not calibrating. Going to a club and calibrating is being social and fun to the people around. People with high emotional intelligence calibrate. You don't see people with high emotional intelligence sitting around being anti-social.
Likewise you calibrate; it has just become intuitive for you. If you are making changes to yourself to make social situations go better then you are calibrating.
"If you believe it strong enough, (which you probably won't at first) people either won't even notice, or join in the fun."
I could say if you believe strong enough that someone will give you a million dollars then it would be essentially the same thing. How much is strong enough? Like a 1000/1000 or a 10/10? How do you access your results. Do you review the situation in your head and make the realization that you just weren't believing enough?
stunnaman71
Member
Join Date: 04/30/2012 | Posts: 36
Good shit Bro.
Screw external validation that's for pussies.
mwaha
Respected Member
Join Date: 02/14/2012 | Posts: 633
CharlieT
Senior Member
Join Date: 02/07/2012 | Posts: 167
shahanshah
Senior Member
Join Date: 04/13/2011 | Posts: 226
you said the following
"But there lies the dilemma, how to not SEEK good reactions if you are trying to get better at something."
I don't understand why you wouldn't seek good interactions and likewise don't understand the problem with seeking good reactions. I mean first off if we didn't care how our interactions went we wouldn't be reading this. We are all here because we want specific interactions to go well. Regardless of what one tells their mind their subconscious is always going to want good interactions. Let's say we do tell our mind that we don't care about the outcome of the interaction. The only reason we are telling our mind we don't care about the interaction is because we think that if we don't care about the reaction then it will go better. IMO it doesn't hurt for someone to seek a good reaction. I think you could argue that it helps.
I think the whole "don't seek good interactions" is misleading. One because it's not possible, and secondly it doesn't really address the problem. The problem is when people identify themseleves as their failures and when they care too much about a single interaction. I think it would be better to just tell people that they shouldn't get upset when they are learning things and they fail. It's part of the process and failure is where one finds a solution.
If they want good reactions then they must seek them. If you don't seek something then you don't want it.
I feel like if you look at any master you will find that they seek what they want. Tiger Wood's clearly seeks to hit a good shot everytime. Does he always hit a good shot, no. If he didn't seek to hit a good shot, aka didn't seek positive reactions then he would not get better.
Drama
Trusted Member
Join Date: 02/26/2008 | Posts: 3727
Matt~
Respected Member
Join Date: 01/20/2008 | Posts: 671
Waginator
Senior Member
Join Date: 02/10/2011 | Posts: 247
Deletedguy3
Trusted Member
Join Date: 04/28/2008 | Posts: 1167
haha Tight! 7:40 .. lolz
Brad-
Instructor | Trusted Member
Join Date: 08/28/2007 | Posts: 3785
Brad-
Instructor | Trusted Member
Join Date: 08/28/2007 | Posts: 3785
Brad-
Instructor | Trusted Member
Join Date: 08/28/2007 | Posts: 3785
haha Tight! 7:40 .. lolz
Brad-
Instructor | Trusted Member
Join Date: 08/28/2007 | Posts: 3785
Brad-
Instructor | Trusted Member
Join Date: 08/28/2007 | Posts: 3785
you said the following
"But there lies the dilemma, how to not SEEK good reactions if you are trying to get better at something."
I don't understand why you wouldn't seek good interactions and likewise don't understand the problem with seeking good reactions. I mean first off if we didn't care how our interactions went we wouldn't be reading this. We are all here because we want specific interactions to go well. Regardless of what one tells their mind their subconscious is always going to want good interactions. Let's say we do tell our mind that we don't care about the outcome of the interaction. The only reason we are telling our mind we don't care about the interaction is because we think that if we don't care about the reaction then it will go better. IMO it doesn't hurt for someone to seek a good reaction. I think you could argue that it helps.
I think the whole "don't seek good interactions" is misleading. One because it's not possible, and secondly it doesn't really address the problem. The problem is when people identify themseleves as their failures and when they care too much about a single interaction. I think it would be better to just tell people that they shouldn't get upset when they are learning things and they fail. It's part of the process and failure is where one finds a solution.
If they want good reactions then they must seek them. If you don't seek something then you don't want it.
I feel like if you look at any master you will find that they seek what they want. Tiger Wood's clearly seeks to hit a good shot everytime. Does he always hit a good shot, no. If he didn't seek to hit a good shot, aka didn't seek positive reactions then he would not get better.
The goal is not to be emotional affected by the reaction. And "seek" what you can control.
So you are not so much "seeking" a good reaciton, as you are seeking to take action in the most proficient way possible based on your knowledge available.
As long as you made a decision to the best of your knowledge, and you carried it out 100%, there's nothing more you could have done.
Yes, after the fact everything changes, you could have done this, you could've done that, but at least you can learn if it doesn't go well.
And HOPEFULLY, through learning, next time you DO have a better reaction, but that's just because you have expanded your knowledge further.
So you strive/seek to master the skill, and the results are the BYPRODUCT of you mastering that skill.
Along with this comes the obvious intuition through experience, that you KNOW what will get a good reaction because it happens so many times when you do XYZ, so it doesn't go as deep as the whole "take action" spiel. You just execute unconsciously, and things click.
This also relates to what you mentioned about not caring about the result. The reason you don't care is because you know that EITHER WAY YOU WILL LEARN AND BE BETTER NEXT TIME.
So it really is win win.
Alright, that was a little nerd mode, make sense though hopefully? It's not something I've tried to explain in text before.
Brad-
Instructor | Trusted Member
Join Date: 08/28/2007 | Posts: 3785
What is wrong with external validation?
People labeled as extroverts are generally more externally validated than introverts yet on average they are much more successful with girls.
You said don't calibrate?
I can name at least ten people who don't calibrate and appear to have fun doing whatever they are doing. These people are the weirdest and most socially awkward people I know.
Going to a club and not being social is not calibrating. Going to a club and calibrating is being social and fun to the people around. People with high emotional intelligence calibrate. You don't see people with high emotional intelligence sitting around being anti-social.
Likewise you calibrate; it has just become intuitive for you. If you are making changes to yourself to make social situations go better then you are calibrating.
"If you believe it strong enough, (which you probably won't at first) people either won't even notice, or join in the fun."
I could say if you believe strong enough that someone will give you a million dollars then it would be essentially the same thing. How much is strong enough? Like a 1000/1000 or a 10/10? How do you access your results. Do you review the situation in your head and make the realization that you just weren't believing enough?
There is no need to quantify your level of belief, you either fall into their frame, or they fall into yours, most of this ends up happening unconsciously as your frame develops and grows.
The problem with external validation, is that to identify with ANYTHING external, you are at the reaction to the environment. Idenitfy yourself as a doctor, what if you lose your job? Identify yourself as a healthy person, what if you catch cancer?
The only thing that you can control is where you choose to focus, and how you take action. Bring it internal, and you are no longer a "reed in the wind."
This gets even harder when a lot of good things happen in your life, because you start identifying with those things, and then grow fears of losing them. Or one bad opinion completely fucks your emotions up. Read my article on my website for more on this.
As for calibration, yes there are extreme examples. But 95% of the guys that read this are WAY TOO OVERLY calibrated, so if they read this, and push 100X towards unstifledness, they probably still won't be extroverted enough...
Don corleon
Respected Member
Join Date: 03/28/2010 | Posts: 582
PowerMaverick
Junior Member
Join Date: 05/20/2012 | Posts: 7
JROC
Junior Member
Join Date: 03/27/2012 | Posts: 2
NamesAreHard
Respected Member
Join Date: 06/15/2011 | Posts: 354
NamesAreHard
Respected Member
Join Date: 06/15/2011 | Posts: 354
tyler0351
Senior Member
Join Date: 09/17/2011 | Posts: 196
If you intended to say that you were reading RSD carefully then I'll go fuck myself.
Brad-
Instructor | Trusted Member
Join Date: 08/28/2007 | Posts: 3785
tyler0351
Senior Member
Join Date: 09/17/2011 | Posts: 196
I used solidarity/solitary/solitude interchangeably up until a few months ago. Was abnormally excited when my professor pointed that out.
Would you ever incorporate that into game? I mean busting on the girl for using horrible grammar/vocabulary. Or is that pushing the point of being an annoying grammar nazi douche type of person?
The other day a girl kept saying "dramastically" (some weird hybrid of dramatically and drastically) so I couldn't help but to bust on her for that, especially since she was bragging about her master's degree while saying it.
Xandercage
Member
Join Date: 01/23/2012 | Posts: 40
I used solidarity/solitary/solitude interchangeably up until a few months ago. Was abnormally excited when my professor pointed that out.
Would you ever incorporate that into game? I mean busting on the girl for using horrible grammar/vocabulary. Or is that pushing the point of being an annoying grammar nazi douche type of person?
The other day a girl kept saying "dramastically" (some weird hybrid of dramatically and drastically) so I couldn't help but to bust on her for that, especially since she was bragging about her master's degree while saying it.
on the other hand you can bust on the girl for the same reason while being a cool, fun, friendly dude amusing himself with whatever situation happens to unfold around him.
like brad was saying in the article, i think it comes down to what frame you are coming from.
subx
Trusted Member
Join Date: 09/18/2008 | Posts: 1227
Mountaineer-~
Senior Member
Join Date: 01/07/2011 | Posts: 283
Jimbiz
Senior Member
Join Date: 12/04/2010 | Posts: 185
Good shit Bro.
Screw external validation that's for pussies.
Brad doesn't count his sit ups. He only counts them when they start hurting, when he feels PAIN. Thats what makes him a champion! NO PAIN, NO GAIN!
Brad is looking pretty stacked these days. What cycle? Like H Drol or something like that?
alvferna
Member
Join Date: 07/26/2011 | Posts: 30
haHAH really cool video thnx bro
Patrick.Bateman
Senior Member
Join Date: 12/03/2011 | Posts: 113
goldenbird
Senior Member
Join Date: 05/18/2008 | Posts: 124
H0wardR0ark
Member
Join Date: 03/23/2011 | Posts: 82
Polarize
Senior Member
Join Date: 08/19/2010 | Posts: 212
champ
Respected Member
Join Date: 06/19/2011 | Posts: 808
Neighbor
Respected Member
Join Date: 12/23/2010 | Posts: 444
Ocean2
Respected Member
Join Date: 07/18/2011 | Posts: 514
Fred E. Rick
Trusted Member
Join Date: 11/02/2010 | Posts: 1034
Good shit Bro.
Screw external validation that's for pussies.
You actually think Brad is on steroids or prohormones?
Blom10
Senior Member
Join Date: 03/27/2010 | Posts: 247
Love this topic though, definitely one of the biggest keys
bey0nd
Junior Member
Join Date: 03/25/2009 | Posts: 5
DogTheBountyHunter
Junior Member
Join Date: 12/27/2010 | Posts: 17
I switched my goals in college from getting an A in this class, to studying this much for every test and doing all my homework to the best of my ability. My grades changed radically because I switched my focus from RESULTS as a consequence of my ACTIONS to being gratified and pumped up by taking the ACTIONS themselves and see the results manifest on their own.
Similarly Brad is not saying you should pretend you don't want good interactions. He's just saying that you're emotional validation and conviction for your goals should be rooted in your ACTIONS and not your RESULTS. Obviously if you are to given the choice between having a good interaction with a girl or getting blown out, or between getting an A in a class or a D, you'll pick the logically better action because you value it more. But that doesn't mean your happiness comes from the girl's approval or the A mark on a test, it comes from your commitment to grow as an individual and become better by taking action.